08.Review procedure
All articles submitted for publication in FSP are subject to a double-blind peer review procedure.
Here is a step-by-step description of our peer review procedure:
01.The Assistant to the Editor at FSP receives your manuscript.
02.Your article is read by the FSP editorial staff. At this stage we check whether your text meets our basic requirements, e.g. we make sure that it has all the necessary references and that it follows our layout requirements. At this stage, papers that are outside of the journal’s scope or do not follow our submission guidelines may be rejected. Otherwise, you may be asked to make necessary changes to the manuscript, including ones aimed at anonymizing the manuscript. If the FSP staff have no objections at this point, they choose the text’s potential reviewers.
03.The manuscript’s title and abstract are sent to the potential reviewers. When choosing referees for a particular manuscript we try to make sure that there is no conflict of interest between the author(s) and either of the reviewers.
04.If the potential reviewers agree to review the manuscript, a timeline will be agreed upon (preferably around a month) and you will be notified that your manuscript is now under review. An anonymized version of your text will then be sent to the two anonymous referees, who do not know your particulars and will not know them until the article is published.
05.The referees send their reviews of your text to the editorial team. The recommended review form can be found here.. On the basis of the reviews, FSP’s Editors decide whether your article can be published in its current form. If the two referees' reviews and opinions on the article vary significantly from each other, a third review may be required.
06.You receive anonymized versions of the reviews, often along with the Editor’s guidelines as to what adjustments need to be made (if any).
07.You send the final version of your text to the Assistant to the Editor.
08.If there are no further objections to the article’s content, FSP’s editorial staff prepare the final version of your article. Otherwise, the paper may need to go through the review process again.
09.You receive the final version of your article for a final proof reading and acceptation.
10.You article is published in FSP.
08.
Review procedure
All articles submitted for publication in FSP are subject to a double-blind peer review procedure.
Here is a step-by-step description of our peer review procedure:
01.The Assistant to the Editor at FSP receives your manuscript.
02.Your article is read by the FSP editorial staff. At this stage we check whether your text meets our basic requirements, e.g. we make sure that it has all the necessary references and that it follows our layout requirements. At this stage, papers that are outside of the journal’s scope or do not follow our submission guidelines may be rejected. Otherwise, you may be asked to make necessary changes to the manuscript, including ones aimed at anonymizing the manuscript. If the FSP staff have no objections at this point, they choose the text’s potential reviewers.
03.The manuscript’s title and abstract are sent to the potential reviewers. When choosing referees for a particular manuscript we try to make sure that there is no conflict of interest between the author(s) and either of the reviewers.
04.If the potential reviewers agree to review the manuscript, a timeline will be agreed upon (preferably around a month) and you will be notified that your manuscript is now under review. An anonymized version of your text will then be sent to the two anonymous referees, who do not know your particulars and will not know them until the article is published.
05.The referees send their reviews of your text to the editorial team. The recommended review form can be found here.. On the basis of the reviews, FSP’s Editors decide whether your article can be published in its current form. If the two referees' reviews and opinions on the article vary significantly from each other, a third review may be required.
06.You receive anonymized versions of the reviews, often along with the Editor’s guidelines as to what adjustments need to be made (if any).
07.You send the final version of your text to the Assistant to the Editor.
08.If there are no further objections to the article’s content, FSP’s editorial staff prepare the final version of your article. Otherwise, the paper may need to go through the review process again.
09.You receive the final version of your article for a final proof reading and acceptation.
10.You article is published in FSP.
08.
Review procedure
All articles submitted for publication in FSP are subject to a double-blind peer review procedure.
Here is a step-by-step description of our peer review procedure:
01.
The Assistant to the Editor at FSP receives your manuscript.
02.
Your article is read by the FSP editorial staff. At this stage we check whether your text meets our basic requirements, e.g. we make sure that it has all the necessary references and that it follows our layout requirements. At this stage, papers that are outside of the journal’s scope or do not follow our submission guidelines may be rejected. Otherwise, you may be asked to make necessary changes to the manuscript, including ones aimed at anonymizing the manuscript. If the FSP staff have no objections at this point, they choose the text’s potential reviewers.
03.
The manuscript’s title and abstract are sent to the potential reviewers. When choosing referees for a particular manuscript we try to make sure that there is no conflict of interest between the author(s) and either of the reviewers.
04.
If the potential reviewers agree to review the manuscript, a timeline will be agreed upon (preferably around a month) and you will be notified that your manuscript is now under review. An anonymized version of your text will then be sent to the two anonymous referees, who do not know your particulars and will not know them until the article is published.
05.
The referees send their reviews of your text to the editorial team. The recommended review form can be found here.. On the basis of the reviews, FSP’s Editors decide whether your article can be published in its current form. If the two referees’ reviews and opinions on the article vary significantly from each other, a third review may be required.
06.
You receive anonymized versions of the reviews, often along with the Editor’s guidelines as to what adjustments need to be made (if any).
07.
You send the final version of your text to the Assistant to the Editor.
08.
If there are no further objections to the article’s content, FSP’s editorial staff prepare the final version of your article. Otherwise, the paper may need to go through the review process again.
09.
You receive the final version of your article for a final proof reading and acceptation.
10.
You article is published in FSP.
