07.Publishing ethics
The editorial staff at Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia are committed to a policy of academic fairness and transparency. In our editorial work we follow the recommendations of The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Our staff make sure that the published research output is original (i.e. not published or considered for publication elsewhere), relevant in terms of the journal’s scope and the respective research disciplines as well as of high quality. See Review procedure for more details.
Any allegations of research misconduct relating to articles published in our journal should be reported to the editorial staff and will be considered by the Editor-in-chief, the approach being chosen on a case-to-case basis.
The journal is open to post-publication discussions with regard to the journal’s content. In such cases please contact our editorial staff.
We expect the authors of the submitted papers to recognize the contributions of other researchers to the respective fields and provide all the necessary references to previous research.
Papers submitted for publication elsewhere or previously published will not be considered for publication with our journal.
It is one of our duties as editors of a scholarly journal to prevent ghost-writing, guest authorship and honorary authorship. This applies mainly to texts that are co-written by multiple authors. When submitting articles for publication in FSP, authors may be asked to reveal how much each of the authors has contributed to the creation of the text in question and how.
Authors may also be asked to submit a financial disclosure, i.e. state what institutions have financed the research that a submitted article is based on (if applicable).
To ensure the integrity and originality of published research, all manuscripts submitted to the journal may be screened for text similarity using iThenticate. The results are reviewed by the editorial team as part of the journal’s standard editorial and publication procedures.
Papers submitted to FSP are subject to a double-blind review procedure. We expect our reviewers to remain objective, to provide a review that is to the best of their abilities and to always provide explanations for their remarks regarding the reviewed papers.
Reviewers who feel that they cannot remain impartial in the review process, e.g. due to a potential conflict of interests with one or more of the authors, are expected to inform the editor of such instances and request to be excluded from the review process. So should potential reviewers who feel that the proposed manuscript is outside of their areas of expertise.
The reviewed articles should be treated confidentially until they have been published.
07.
Publishing ethics
The editorial staff at Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia are committed to a policy of academic fairness and transparency. In our editorial work we follow the recommendations of The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Our staff make sure that the published research output is original (i.e. not published or considered for publication elsewhere), relevant in terms of the journal’s scope and the respective research disciplines as well as of high quality. See Review procedure for more details.
Any allegations of research misconduct relating to articles published in our journal should be reported to the editorial staff and will be considered by the Editor-in-chief, the approach being chosen on a case-to-case basis.
The journal is open to post-publication discussions with regard to the journal’s content. In such cases please contact our editorial staff.
We expect the authors of the submitted papers to recognize the contributions of other researchers to the respective fields and provide all the necessary references to previous research.
Papers submitted for publication elsewhere or previously published will not be considered for publication with our journal.
It is one of our duties as editors of a scholarly journal to prevent ghost-writing, guest authorship and honorary authorship. This applies mainly to texts that are co-written by multiple authors. When submitting articles for publication in FSP, authors may be asked to reveal how much each of the authors has contributed to the creation of the text in question and how.
Authors may also be asked to submit a financial disclosure, i.e. state what institutions have financed the research that a submitted article is based on (if applicable).
To ensure the integrity and originality of published research, all manuscripts submitted to the journal may be screened for text similarity using iThenticate. The results are reviewed by the editorial team as part of the journal’s standard editorial and publication procedures.
Papers submitted to FSP are subject to a double-blind review procedure. We expect our reviewers to remain objective, to provide a review that is to the best of their abilities and to always provide explanations for their remarks regarding the reviewed papers.
Reviewers who feel that they cannot remain impartial in the review process, e.g. due to a potential conflict of interests with one or more of the authors, are expected to inform the editor of such instances and request to be excluded from the review process. So should potential reviewers who feel that the proposed manuscript is outside of their areas of expertise.
The reviewed articles should be treated confidentially until they have been published.
07.
Publishing ethics
The editorial staff at Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia are committed to a policy of academic fairness and transparency. In our editorial work we follow the recommendations of The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Our staff make sure that the published research output is original (i.e. not published or considered for publication elsewhere), relevant in terms of the journal’s scope and the respective research disciplines as well as of high quality. See Review procedure for more details.
Any allegations of research misconduct relating to articles published in our journal should be reported to the editorial staff and will be considered by the Editor-in-chief, the approach being chosen on a case-to-case basis.
The journal is open to post-publication discussions with regard to the journal’s content. In such cases please contact our editorial staff.
We expect the authors of the submitted papers to recognize the contributions of other researchers to the respective fields and provide all the necessary references to previous research.
Papers submitted for publication elsewhere or previously published will not be considered for publication with our journal.
It is one of our duties as editors of a scholarly journal to prevent ghost-writing, guest authorship and honorary authorship. This applies mainly to texts that are co-written by multiple authors. When submitting articles for publication in FSP, authors may be asked to reveal how much each of the authors has contributed to the creation of the text in question and how.
Authors may also be asked to submit a financial disclosure, i.e. state what institutions have financed the research that a submitted article is based on (if applicable).
To ensure the integrity and originality of published research, all manuscripts submitted to the journal may be screened for text similarity using iThenticate. The results are reviewed by the editorial team as part of the journal’s standard editorial and publication procedures.
Papers submitted to FSP are subject to a double-blind review procedure. We expect our reviewers to remain objective, to provide a review that is to the best of their abilities and to always provide explanations for their remarks regarding the reviewed papers.
Reviewers who feel that they cannot remain impartial in the review process, e.g. due to a potential conflict of interests with one or more of the authors, are expected to inform the editor of such instances and request to be excluded from the review process. So should potential reviewers who feel that the proposed manuscript is outside of their areas of expertise.
The reviewed articles should be treated confidentially until they have been published.
